Skip to main content

Data Enrichment

Data enrichment is a crucial step that involves adding metadata like document titles, authors, timestamps, section headers and entity tags to make content more searchable, traceable and useful for retrieval. Enriching before chunking ensures each chunk inherits this context whilst avoiding the complexity of retroactively mapping metadata. Additionally, enrichment improves filtering (by date or by document type), supports better source display, and enables more advanced semantic queries. While NLP-based enrichment like entity extraction or topic tagging is optional, it can significantly enhance the retrieval experience.

Important aspects of data enrichment include:

  • Metadata Tagging: This involves attaching extra information to each document or chunk. Examples of metadata are the document’s source, type (faq, manual, email), date of publication, author, topic category or even security clearance level. Such tags can later be used to filter search results (for instance, only search within category:finance documents if the query is financial).

  • Entity Recognition and Linking: Using NLP techniques to identify entities (like person names, organization names, locations, product names) in the text and possibly linking them to a knowledge base or consistent ID. For example, every mention of “IBM” could be tagged as ORG:IBM and perhaps linked to a company database entry. This allows the system to understand that “International Business Machines” and “IBM” are the same entity, improving search and avoidance of ambiguity.

  • Acronym Expansion: Domain text often has acronyms or jargon. Enrichment can involve expanding these acronyms inline or as metadata. For example noting that “CHF” stands for “congestive heart failure” in a medical text ensures the model doesn’t confuse it with the Swiss Franc currency. Contextual data enrichment like this gives the LLM the needed background to interpret queries correctly.

  • Semantic Embellishments: Sometimes external data is pulled in to enrich. For example, you can append a snippet of a Wikipedia definition to certain technical terms in the text (if accuracy permits) or add further classifications (like sentiment score of a review or risk level of a report). Another example would be to attach an ontology tag – if an internal taxonomy says “Project X is a type of Internal Initiative”, a tag can be added. This is similar to building a lightweight knowledge graph on top of text.

  • Permissions and Access Level Tags: In enterprise settings, enrichment might also include tagging content with who is allowed to see it or its confidentiality level. While this is more about security, it’s a crucial part of making a production-ready system that ensures that retrieval can filter out documents a given user shouldn’t see.

  • Document Summaries or Highlights: A special form of enrichment is generating a brief summary or extracting key phrases from each document. This doesn’t replace the full text (which will still be stored in full), but it gives an at-a-glance view that can be used in UIs or even in retrieval scoring.

Enrichment can be seen as creating a richer index for the knowledge base. For instance, a document chunk about a software issue might be enriched with tags: {product: ABC, issue_type: login_error, priority: high}. Later, if a user asks “How do I fix login errors in ABC?”, the retrieval system can directly filter for product: ABC and maybe boost chunks tagged issue_type: login_error. This reduces ambiguity and improves precision.

In summary, Data Enrichment makes data smarter. If cleaning is about removing the bad, enrichment is about adding the good. It attaches meaning and context that aren’t explicitly in the raw text. While it can require additional NLP processing or integration with other databases, the payoff is a much more effective retrieval stage and ultimately more relevant answers from the LLM.